Start from the Nature of History
History is a dynamic, evidence-based discipline. Claims should be tested, interpretations compared, and context handled carefully.
Chronology is the frame for that work. Without reliable boundaries, cause claims blur, source judgements weaken, and significance becomes guesswork.
How TimeToTime supports core IB concepts
TimeToTime helps us convert concept language into daily practice.
- Cause and Consequence: model causal interplay using the Link feature.
- Continuity and Change: inspect long-term patterns on timeline views.
- Perspective: situate sources and arguments in their historical setting.
- Significance: compare short-term impact with longer-term consequences.
How TimeToTime supports IB skills
The same workflow supports Using sources, Making connections, Evaluating arguments, and Asking questions.
- Using sources: stabilise chronology before judging origin and purpose.
- Making connections: capture relationships between actors, structures, and events.
- Evaluating arguments: test claims against sequence and overlap.
- Asking questions: use timeline patterns to generate sharper inquiry questions.
Art history and general history both fit
Whether you focus on art movements, political change, conflict, or social transformation, the method is the same: situate, compare, evaluate.
Use folders to learn up to 5 decks together and compare regions, themes, and eras side by side.
How TimeToTime Helps You
TimeToTime brings IB concept work and skill development into one practical daily system.
- Contextual and exact-year prompts build durable chronological awareness.
- The Link feature maps causal interplay and supporting conditions.
- Timeline visualisation and folders help compare patterns across cases.
- Spaced review keeps historical context available for essays and source analysis.
Takeaway
Use TimeToTime as an inquiry partner: chronology for context, Link relationships for causal interplay, and regular review for confident argumentation.