You are not bad at history
Many people say they are "bad at dates," but usually they were asked to memorise isolated facts with no narrative.
Memory works better when each fact has a role. If an event is linked to causes, consequences, and people you already know, recalling it becomes more natural.
Why mixed questions work better than raw memorising
TimeToTime does not ask you to choose one style. It alternates contextual placement with exact-year recall, so each date has meaning and precision.
- Context prompts test whether you can position events in sequence.
- Precision prompts test whether you can retrieve the exact year.
- Together they reduce brittle memorisation and improve transfer.
Then add the year as a confidence check
Once you can position events reliably, adding the exact year no longer feels random. You are not memorising noise; you are refining a model.
That is why spaced review works: each revisit strengthens both context and precision, not just one number.
How TimeToTime Helps You
TimeToTime pairs context and precision by design, and links let you grow the relationships around each date.
- Each date appears in both contextual and exact-year question formats.
- Links between events help you build narrative memory instead of isolated facts.
- Anchor dates give stable reference points to place new events more quickly.
Takeaway
If you hate memorising dates, you can still learn history effectively by using both relationship cues and exact-year recall together.